Voting
When we buy shares in a company, we gain the right to vote at the company’s shareholder meetings. This means that we have a say in director elections and important decisions that affect our investments.
When we buy shares in a company, we gain the right to vote at the company’s shareholder meetings. This means that we have a say in director elections and important decisions that affect our investments.
When voting at shareholder meetings, we consider whether the board operates effectively and whether our shareholder rights are adequately protected. Our default position is to support the company while also expressing our positions and expectations. We have clear views on what company boards should look like, and we can vote against the board if the company does not conform to them.
Our starting point is to support boards in their work. Our company engagements, together with our global voting guidelines and position papers, inform our voting decisions.
In some key areas, such as CEO pay, board independence and election of a combined chair/CEO, we voted against fewer proposals in 2025, reflecting evolving company practices, regulatory developments and changes to our portfolio.
With investments in 7,201 companies, the fund leaves most decisions to their board and management. This requires boards to do their job effectively, and management to have the right incentives. Our global voting guidelines set out principles for our voting which we believe will contribute to effective boards and good corporate governance.
Our position papers set out our views on specific topics and serve as a starting point for both our voting and our dialogue with companies and standard setters.
We have a framework for voting on shareholder proposals related to sustainability. This ensures that we make considered and consistent voting assessments across all companies in the portfolio. When assessing proposals we consider three elements: materiality, prescriptiveness and relevant company- or market-specific circumstances.